The objective of this work is to present a new practical methodology to manage petroleum fields considering three stages (life-cycle, short-term, and real-time) that can run alongside different model fidelities and characteristics. The model-based field management process follows the general methodology proposed by Schiozer et al. (2019) with four activities: (1) fit-for-purpose models construction, (2) data assimilation for uncertainty reduction, (3) life-cycle production optimization and (4) short-term optimization for real-time implementation. The selection of the production strategy for field management comprehends the last two activities. Life-cycle optimization is the first stage of the process and generates control setpoints for short-term analysis. Short-term optimization is then used to improve the quality of the solutions considering the control parameters of the next cycle (considering a closed-loop procedure). Real-time solution is then implemented considering operational disturbances from real operations. The methodology was applied to a benchmark case (UNISIM-IV-2026) which is a case based on a typical carbonate field from the Brazilian Pre-salt, with light oil and submitted to Water-Alternate-Gas injection with CO2 (WAG-CO2). The results show that the methodology is applicable to real and complex fields. As the three stages can run simultaneously, one can (1) use different model fidelities to improve the quality of the solutions and (2) use model-based solutions for real-time implementation. Life-cycle optimization using complex simulation models and long-term objectives can run in the background to generate control setpoints for short-term analysis in which lower fidelity models and simplified solutions can be used for the control and field revitalization parameters of each closed-loop cycle. Real-time solutions can be implemented considering operational problems and disturbances. This work presents a novel procedure to integrate three stages for production optimization that can run in parallel, allowing the integration of life-cycle and real-time solutions. The methodology (1) allows the use of complex reservoir simulation models from the life-cycle production strategy optimization, (2) focuses short-term control parameters that improve the quality of the short-term solution, and (3) guides real-time implementation, so it can be the basis to a digital field management.
Tag: enhanced recovery
Numerical Study on the Impact of Advanced Phenomena in a Fractured Carbonate Reservoir Subjected to WAG-CO2 Injection
Advanced phenomena related to water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection are usually neglected in numerical simulations. This work evaluates the impact of different physical phenomena on field indicators, considering a typical pre-salt carbonate reservoir (UNISIM-II-D-CO, a dual-por dual-perm compositional case) subjected to WAG-CO2 injection. Additionally, the computational cost incurred by each of these phenomena is evaluated, since it represents a great challenge in optimization and probabilistic studies. The following phenomena are evaluated considering a nominal base case: (i) matrix-fracture transfer calculation, (ii) relative permeability hysteresis, (iii) CO2 and CH4 solubilities in aqueous phase, (iv) diffusion, (v) numerical dispersion control models, and (vi) velocity-dependent dispersion. CO2 and CH4 solubilities in the aqueous phase, as well as molecular diffusion, did not have a significant impact on field indicators, but they increased simulation runtime more than two times. Matrix-fracture transfer modeling was the most impactful factor, followed by hysteresis and velocity-dependent dispersion. Therefore, the impact of these phenomena was also investigated in a probabilistic approach, considering an ensemble of 197 geostatistical scenarios under uncertainty. Risk curves revealed that the advanced matrix-fracture transfer models improve sweep efficiency. This effect is mainly due to gravity force which acts as a driving mechanism for the oil moving from the matrix to fractures. The capillary effect, in turn, was small compared to gravity. The impact of dispersion and hysteresis on risk curves were smaller than the effect of matrix-fracture transfer modelling. However, these phenomena are particularly interesting in UNISIM-II-D-CO due to the presence of Super-K facies. Hysteresis, when applied to low and high permeability layers, reduced gas mobility and, consequently, the gas produced, contributing to the NPV for most models under uncertainty. On the other hand, the velocity-dependent dispersion mainly affected fluid flows in the regions adjacent to Super-K layers, promoting better oil recovery. The inclusion of advanced phenomena related to WAG-CO2 injection can hold importance when modeling fractured carbonate fields, like those found in the Pre-Salt in Brazil. Nevertheless, computational costs might make their inclusion impractical in full-field simulation models employed for optimization and probabilistic studies. In such cases, it is recommended to assess low-fidelity models or alternatives to accelerate simulations, focusing mainly on the most impactful phenomena related to WAG-CO2 injection.
Model-Based Life-Cycle Optimization for Field Development and Management Integrated with Production Facilities
Reservoir simulation models often support decision making in the development and management of petroleum fields. The process is complex, sometimes treated subjectively, and many methods and parameterization techniques are available. When added to uncertainties, the lack of standardized procedures may yield largely suboptimal decisions. In this work, we present a comprehensive outline for model-based life-cycle production optimization problems, establishing guidelines to make the process less subjective. Based on several applications and a literature review, we established a consistent methodology by defining seven elements of the process: (1) the degree of fidelity of reservoir models; (2) objective function (single- or multi-objective, nominal or probabilistic); (3) integration between reservoir and production facilities (boundary conditions, IPM); (4) parametrization (design, control and revitalization optimization variables); (5) monitoring variables (for search space reduction); (6) optimization method, including optimizer/ algorithm, search space exploration, faster-objective function estimators (coarse models, emulators, others), type of ensemble-based optimization (robust or nominal based on representative models); (7) additional improvements (value of information and flexibility). With an application on a publicly available benchmark reservoir, this work shows how a model-based life-cycle optimization process can be systematically defined. In this initial work, the focus is the field development phase and some simplifications were made due to the high computational demand, but in future works we plan to address the control and revitalization variables and reduce the number of simplifications to compare. The optimization results are analyzed to understand the evolution of the objective function and the evolution of the optimization variables. We also discuss the importance of including uncertainties in the process and we discuss future work to emphasize the difference between life-cycle (control rules) and short-term (effective control) management of equipment, as well as ways to deal with the computational intensity of the problem, such as the combined use of representative models and fast simulation models.